10 Movies & Shows Similar to Meteor: First Impact (2022)

Description: Shares with 'Meteor: First Impact' the theme of a last-ditch effort to save Earth from a space-borne catastrophe. Both films combine high-stakes action with personal drama, featuring teams of experts racing against time. The visual spectacle of destruction is another common element.

Fact: NASA uses this film as a training exercise for management - they're asked to spot as many scientific inaccuracies as possible. The film's soundtrack featured Aerosmith's hit 'I Don't Want to Miss a Thing'. Bruce Willis reportedly earned $14 million for his role.

Description: Similar to 'Meteor: First Impact' in its depiction of an impending celestial disaster threatening Earth. Both films focus on the human response to a global catastrophe, blending scientific elements with emotional storytelling. The visual effects of a massive object colliding with Earth are a key similarity.

Fact: The film was released the same year as 'Armageddon', leading to a friendly rivalry between the two. It features a more scientifically accurate approach to the disaster compared to many other films in the genre. The movie's comet was named 'Wolf-Biederman' after the film's visual effects supervisors.

Description: Shares with 'Meteor: First Impact' the theme of a team attempting to prevent a global catastrophe through unconventional scientific means. Both films blend real science with creative speculation, featuring high-stakes missions to save humanity. The visual effects of planetary-scale destruction are comparable.

Fact: The film's science was so inaccurate that NASA scientists held a public debunking session. The 'unobtainium' material mentioned in the film is a real engineering term for hypothetical perfect materials. The director insisted on practical effects where possible, including real molten metal for some scenes.

Description: Shares with 'Meteor: First Impact' the theme of sudden, catastrophic global change and humanity's struggle to survive. Both films feature dramatic visual effects showing widespread destruction and extreme weather events. The scientific premise (though exaggerated) is central to both stories.

Fact: The film's blizzard scenes were shot in Montreal during actual snowstorms. It was one of the first major films to depict climate change as an immediate threat. The movie's budget was $125 million, with $65 million spent on visual effects.

Description: Like 'Meteor: First Impact', this film deals with the prediction and inevitable approach of a global catastrophe. Both explore themes of fate and determinism alongside the disaster narrative. The films share a mix of mystery and apocalyptic spectacle.

Fact: The film's number sequences were based on actual historical disasters. Director Alex Proyas insisted on practical effects for the plane crash scene. The ending was controversial and underwent several revisions during production.

Description: Similar to 'Meteor: First Impact' in its portrayal of global catastrophe and mass destruction. Both films feature ordinary people trying to survive extraordinary circumstances, with spectacular disaster sequences. The theme of planetary-scale disaster connects them strongly.

Fact: The film's marketing campaign included fake scientific warnings about the 2012 phenomenon. It holds the record for most scenes of destruction in a single film (estimated at 1,500). The film's budget was $200 million, making it one of the most expensive films ever made at the time.

Description: While more dramatic than 'Meteor: First Impact', both films deal with humanity facing an impending meteor impact. They share themes of how people react to certain doom, though this film focuses more on personal relationships than global catastrophe. The emotional tone of facing inevitable disaster connects them.

Fact: The film was shot in just 32 days. Steve Carell and Keira Knightley improvised many of their scenes. The filmmakers intentionally avoided showing the meteor until the final moments to maintain focus on the characters.

Description: Similar to 'Meteor: First Impact' in its depiction of global-scale environmental disasters threatening humanity. Both films combine political intrigue with scientific disaster scenarios, featuring advanced technology gone wrong. The visual spectacle of worldwide destruction connects them strongly.

Fact: The film underwent extensive reshoots, delaying its release by a year. It was the directorial debut of producer Dean Devlin. The space station in the film was based on real NASA concepts for orbital construction.

Description: Like 'Meteor: First Impact', this film deals with a celestial body threatening Earth, combining science fiction with disaster movie elements. Both feature unlikely heroes attempting to prevent catastrophe, with a mix of scientific speculation and dramatic action sequences.

Fact: Director Roland Emmerich originally conceived the idea in 2006 but couldn't get funding until

Description: Like 'Meteor: First Impact', this film focuses on a family's survival during a global meteor disaster. Both emphasize the human aspect of catastrophe rather than just the spectacle. The realistic portrayal of societal breakdown during crisis is a shared theme.

Fact: The film was shot in just 39 days. Originally planned for theatrical release, it became a streaming hit during the COVID-19 pandemic. The comet fragments in the film are named 'Clarke' after science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke.