10 Horror Movies with Low Ratings That Are Surprisingly Entertaining

Description: Often cited as the worst film ever made, this Ed Wood classic features aliens trying to resurrect the dead to stop humanity. Its low budget, poor acting, and nonsensical plot make it a must-see for horror fans.

Fact: The film was shot with stock footage from other movies, and Bela Lugosi, who appears in the film, died before production began; his scenes were completed with a double.

Description: A family on a road trip encounters a cult worshipping the god Manos. Known for its amateurish production, poor acting, and nonsensical plot, it's a film that's so bad, it's fascinating.

Fact: The film was made by a fertilizer salesman with no prior filmmaking experience, and it was featured on "Mystery Science Theater 3000," where it gained its cult status.

Description: This sequel to the iconic "The Exorcist" is often considered one of the worst follow-ups in film history. Its bizarre plot involving locusts and mind-reading machines is more confusing than terrifying.

Fact: The film was a commercial and critical failure, with even the original director, William Friedkin, disowning it.

Description: Despite its name, it has nothing to do with trolls or the original "Troll" movie. Instead, it features a family terrorized by vegetarian goblins. Its absurdity and poor production values make it a beloved "so bad, it's good" film.

Fact: The film has inspired a documentary, "Best Worst Movie," which explores its cult following. It's also known for its infamous "Oh my God!" scene.

Description: This remake of the 1973 classic is infamous for its over-the-top acting, particularly by Nicolas Cage, and its bizarre plot involving bees and a cult. It's a horror film that's more likely to make you laugh than scream.

Fact: The film has become a meme generator, especially for Cage's iconic "Not the bees!" scene.

Description: M. Night Shyamalan's attempt at an eco-horror film about plants releasing toxins to kill humans is often criticized for its wooden dialogue and bizarre plot. It's a film that's more unintentionally funny than scary.

Fact: The film was panned by critics, with some calling it one of the worst movies of the decade.

Description: This sequel takes the already disturbing concept of the first film and amplifies it to grotesque levels. Its graphic nature and lack of subtlety make it a film that's hard to watch but impossible to forget.

Fact: The film was banned in several countries for its extreme content, and it's known for its black-and-white aesthetic to avoid an NC-17 rating.

Description: This made-for-TV movie about a tornado filled with sharks is so ridiculous that it's become a cultural phenomenon. Its low-budget special effects and campy performances make it a guilty pleasure.

Fact: The film has spawned multiple sequels, each more outlandish than the last, and has even been turned into a stage musical.

Description: This film attempts to be a modern-day "The Birds" but falls flat with its poor special effects, wooden acting, and bizarre plot twists. It's a perfect example of how not to make a horror movie.

Fact: The director, James Nguyen, spent 10 years making this film, which was largely self-funded. It has since become a cult classic for its unintentional humor.

Description: While not strictly a horror film, its cult status as one of the worst movies ever made makes it a must-watch for horror fans looking for a laugh. Its unintentional comedy has made it a staple at midnight screenings.

Fact: The film was written, directed, produced, and starred Tommy Wiseau, who also financed it with his own money. It has become a cultural phenomenon, spawning numerous memes and even a biographical film, "The Disaster Artist."